FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Era-comp

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Bassa hound

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 01:29, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:49, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:12, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • As with Nek, I think it should be "The Bassa Hound was a heavy-hoofed, non-sentient species". Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:22, December 28, 2017 (UTC)
    • Done.
  • You should add a timeframe for the events described. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:22, December 28, 2017 (UTC)
    • The 34 ABY reference got a bit wordy, so it might need to be cleaned up. - Cwedin(talk) 00:22, January 4, 2018 (UTC)
      • I'm not sure you can say it's definitely in the same year based on the logic in the reference, you'll need to change it to "around 34 ABY" or better yet "less than a year before X event that occured in 34 ABY". For example the release of TLJ was less than a year a go from today, but didn't occur in 2018. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:11, January 6, 2018 (UTC)
        • Fair point. How's it look now? - Cwedin(talk) 23:20, January 7, 2018 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I might be misreading the article, but it sounds like it is the same bassa hound that is set loose during the Imperial era and then shows up again around 34 ABY. It seems like the article should note something about how long these animals live if we know for a fact that they are the same.
    • Banz only encounters a single bassa hound, but there could be others, so I've rephrased the article to clear that up.
  • More of a question: Does the novel state that all of the creatures are still in a group around 34 ABY, which would be 25 years after they were set loose? That just seems a little odd to me. How exactly is the information given to the reader?--Exiled Jedi (talk) 16:33, January 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • Prior to Banz's mission, Ackbar says:
      "[Vodran] was the stronghold of Harra the Hutt. She and her collection of scum and troublemakers abandoned Vodran during an Imperial incursion…"
    • and later, when Banz encounters the misfit herd, the narration reads:
      "When Harra the Hutt had abandoned the planet, it was assumed she'd taken her business with her. It seemed that she hadn't and that her animals had returned to the wild, thriving even in that harsh environment."
    • Doesn't make much sense, but it's still not the strangest thing from these books. Interestingly, numerous characters in the second book claim that the First Order took Harra's palace, but all those characters are proven to be unreliable, and that would completely derail the first book. - Cwedin(talk) 04:42, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
SE
  • Can we get an article for the taking of Harra's stronghold? Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:31, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
    • There's not much to say about that (there was no fight, Harra just ran), but I'll make an article for the Imperial incursion mentioned above. - Cwedin(talk) 04:42, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
ProfessorTofty
  • Looks mostly good to me. Only one suggestion - context perhaps for the attack on Tuanul and the Resistance's activities? ProfessorTofty (talk) 16:49, January 22, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

EV-2-E

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 20:33, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: An EV-II? Who knows?

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:40, January 12, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Cwedin(talk) 05:29, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:32, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • The Star Wars Character Encyclopedia and Scavenger's Guide to Droids references will need expanding, since those sources don't specifically say that EV-2-E is manufactured by MerenData or a 3rd degree droid. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:04, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Alliance to Restore the Republic is currently infobox exclusive. You could resolve this for giving context for the GCW. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:26, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
    • Judging from other status articles, I believe that mentioning the Alliance Fleet in the body is sufficient. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:30, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • The sourcing of the droid's affiliation is inconsistent between the infobox and the body. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:54, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • The Mantan Wanderer being the flagship can't be sourced to Rules of Engaement, nor can EV-2-E's affiliation be sources to the CSWE. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:07, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • You can re-word it to something like "served in the Alliance Fleet's 14th Roving Line (RoE) onboard the line's flagship, the Mantan Wanderer. (CSWE) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:16, January 8, 2018 (UTC)
The CP

3rd-degree is still infobox exclusive. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:24, January 16, 2018 (UTC)

  • Per Toprawa and Ralltiir objections on EG-9: “I don't think the article body needs to mention the fact that EG-9 is a fifth-degree droid, particularly since that information is tangentially related to his character (i.e., from sources that don't even mention him). Stating that he's a labor droid is tantamount to saying he's fifth-degree without needing to say it outright and leaving it for the infobox. It's similar to how we don't need to say, for example, R2-D2 is part of the R-series droid line if we already state he's part of the R2 series, or how we don't need to say a clone trooper is male, because that's understood by saying he's a clone trooper, etc. The infobox field suffices.” - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:38, January 16, 2018 (UTC)
IMP-2-E
  • Since you specify EV was active during the Rebellion era (and the GCW was a 21-year-long period in Legends), you should also specify it in the body. I.e., from 0 BBY to 5 ABY. Imperators II(Talk) 00:17, January 18, 2018 (UTC)
    • I left it open because, while the books is centred on the Rebel Specforce, it’s New Republic counterpart is mentioned as well. I want to look though and see if the books keeps it ambiguous so ideas can be used in both eras. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 01:21, January 18, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Antakaria system

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 16:49, January 11, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:04, January 22, 2018 (UTC)
  3. AV-6R7Crew Pit 04:10, January 22, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sarini Island

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Ulklub

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Andando

  • Nominated by: Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:05, January 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote The Planet of Unchecked Aqualish Violence. Imperators II(Talk) 20:55, January 12, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:33, January 16, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Imperators
  • Added a category for you to create.
    • Created and populated. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:19, January 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • Is the Aqualish Civil War the war the article refers to?
    • Unclear; it could be referring to the war of conquest that the Aqualish fought after the war, but then again this did happen in the aftermath of the civil war. I my opinion, this was likely a reference to the former. - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:23, January 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • Ando system is in The Slice per TEA. Imperators II(Talk) 18:20, January 12, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Sentinel (Interdictor cruiser)

  • Nominated by: TK-999 @fandom (talk) 18:47, January 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I think there are only two named Interdictors in the Thrawn trilogy and this is one of them.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Hey TK

Comments

Sentinel is a name your Interdictor cruisers can get when you as a player build some in the game Star Wars: Empire at War. However I haven't been able to find any appearances of an Interdictor named Sentinel in the game's actual missions, so as noted on the talk page, I removed the EaW parts from the in-universe section of the article. It'd be great if someone can double-check this in case I overlooked something, as I don't have access to EaW at the moment.TK-999 @fandom (talk) 18:47, January 12, 2018 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (EC only)

  1. ECvote Unaddressed objection more than a week old. Imperators II(Talk) 12:41, January 20, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:43, January 20, 2018 (UTC)


Tatrang I

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Yeast-worm jelly

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 05:25, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: How to Eat Fried Yeast-Worms

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Well, if Ked likes it... - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:35, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

AV
  • Are we able to assume that yeast-worm jelly is made from, well, yeast-worms? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:12, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
    • I was wondering that too, but I don't think so. "Yeast-worm" could mean yeast and worms, or it could just be a nickname. - Cwedin(talk) 06:23, January 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Gannaria system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 15:32, January 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Gannarian Lando-spice.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.