FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Unidentified Sith witch

  • Nominated by: Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:35, March 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Witches are cool, especially if they're Sith

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:31, April 1, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 20:50, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
  3. Nice work! --Lewisr (talk) 22:26, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Lewisr
  • Twilight of the Apprentice doesn't mention anything about the Galactic Civil War --Lewisr (talk) 16:36, March 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • You should probably add that she died on Malachor in the infobox --Lewisr (talk) 19:27, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • Just a quick question, does Dawn of Rebellion say the battle was fought between the Jedi Order or just the Jedi? --Lewisr (talk) 19:27, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • Only states Jedi, no Order. Twilight mentions Jedi Knights, Darth Maul part II also only mentions Jedi.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:19, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
      • Fair enough, was just checking --Lewisr (talk) 21:27, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy
  • Female is infobox exclusive.
  • Who wrote Dawn of Rebellion and when was it released (year is fine)?
    • Can't find author, year added--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:40, March 30, 2018 (UTC)
      • Is the author not mentioned in the book itself (I presume you have it)?
        • No a friend sends pics and searches the book for me fortunately, I'm going to be getting the book soon. I forgot to ask him if he can find the author, I'll do so now--Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:35, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • "in the battle, since the" should have a full stop (period for you Americans), not a comma.
  • I think you should say "petrifying and killing all the combatants", to show the witch herself died.
  • Is the "established that millennia before the mission to Malachor," necessary to the first ref note, which is just to say she died.
  • Your Sith Empire ref should be used in the body too, not just the infobox, Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:20, March 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Why do you need both ref 3 and ref 5? If Star Wars: The Force Awakens: The Visual Dictionary doesn't mention the witch, you need to use the full ref you use in the infobox. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:35, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Good catch. I fixed it but had to re-add it in another point in the article for a reference to what the cold war is--Vitus InfinitusTalk 23:11, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • As per WP:MOS#Naming_articles, you shouldn't have links in the bolded part; you'll have to link that stuff later.
  • You should avoid referring to things as "unidentified", even in the Bts. It's unlikely they're unidentified in the Star Wars universe. You can, however, write in the Bts that they were unnamed in the source. 1358 (Talk) 01:05, April 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • There's no reason why you shouldn't establish a more concrete timeline. We apparently know that the mission to Malachor took place in 3 BBY. Why not say that the Great Scourge of Malachor took place millennia before 3 BBY instead? 1358 (Talk) 17:14, April 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • Time was incorrect, fixed--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:27, April 11, 2018 (UTC)
      • One of your references says "millennium" while the rest of the article uses "millennia". Which is correct? 1358 (Talk) 20:41, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
AV
  • Context for Cold War please. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:29, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • We're going to need a rough start and end date for the Cold War as well. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:51, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Honor Guard

  • Nominated by: Vitus InfinitusTalk 03:49, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The honorable Honor Guard is composed of honorable honor guards from the Senate Guard that guard the Senate.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:20, April 4, 2018 (UTC)
  2. AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:23, April 5, 2018 (UTC)

Object

The honourable Tommy (yes that's how you spell it!)
  • Galactic Republic is infobox exclusive.
  • Who wrote Senate Murders?
    • Added--Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:14, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
      • You're missing a space. Also, try to work the writers in so they can use the same ref as the beginning, to reduce the amount of refs you use.
  • In the infobox you refer to the Senate Guard as a singular, as if it is a specific organisation, but in the body you call them the Senate Guards, as it they are a group. Please make sure this is accurate and uniform throughout.
  • Per my reply to your message, we can't source the events to 21 BBY with Galactic Atlas, so if you want to mention the date, it should be something like around 21 BBY, with a ref note explaining why.
  • In the BTS you refer to the Honor Guard as "they", but in the body you say "The Honor Guard[1] was". Is it singular or plural? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 11:10, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think just "Guard" is sufficient for the type field in the infobox, Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 11:13, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
  • Could you get an audio file for the quote please. I think Ayrehead may be able to get one for you if you ask nicely, Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:58, March 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • I've been told this isn't a requirement for status articles. My apologies. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:20, April 4, 2018 (UTC)
      • No worries, Ayrehead was able to add the audio.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 12:40, April 5, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • I'm not sure what you're trying to say in your date reference. How exactly do we know that "Senate Murders" takes place after "Legacy of Terror" and before "Massacre"? 1358 (Talk) 21:20, April 18, 2018 (UTC)
  • We've been treating the old sw.com episode guides as Canon with the reasoning that they were adapted directly from the script. SWicon The Clone Wars Episode Guide: Senate Murders on StarWars.com (content now obsolete; backup link) mentions them in the "Trivia and Details" section and there's a nice Bts tidbit you should add to this article.
  • Review note: {{SW}} requires archivedate (preferred) or archiveurl. {{cite web}} is probably the only template that has a separate parameter for the date when the page was archived. 1358 (Talk) 23:40, April 20, 2018 (UTC)
    • So do I use {{cite web}} instead of {{SW}}?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:13, April 21, 2018 (UTC)
      • No, always use the most specific citation template. I'm just saying that cite web is the only one that requires both archiveurl and archivedate. The others require one of them. 1358 (Talk) 18:26, April 21, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Belloria system

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:03, April 5, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:22, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Do Bellorian Ale next. 1358 (Talk) 20:45, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
  4. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:24, April 19, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Kidnapping of Hoxie

  • Nominated by: Commander Code-8 (talk) 09:19, April 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let the universe howl in despair, for I have returned! Picking up right where I left off, writing articles about a game only I care about. Expect this to be quite rusty

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Good work. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:56, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote I believe MasterFredcerique also cares deeply for Galactic Battlegrounds. Imperators II(Talk) 15:34, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 21:21, April 19, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • BTS needs to be full referenced.
  • Who developed Galactic Battlegrounds?
  • I think the first sentence should have commas around "in the year 3000 BBY" to break it up.
  • "which was left leaderless and continued participating in the war." Are you talking about Otoh Raban or the stronghold where Hoxie was held?
  • Should boss be capitalised in the penultimate sentence?
  • "Gallo to attacked the stronghold with his army…" this doesn't make sense.
  • You should say which game mentioned the kidnapping first.
    • All addressed. I'm a bit iffy on including the developer in the Bts, but I guess it's equivalent to naming an author for articles created in novels.Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 13:13, April 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • Yeah that's what I thought.
  • Is there anything notable about the second mention that necessitates a BTS mention?
  • I think you should change "allowing him" to "which would allow him".
  • "Shortly after the kidnapping" should have a comma after it as the current sentence is a bit confusing.
  • In the last sentence, I think you should say "Gallo then attacked". Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:24, April 8, 2018 (UTC)
    • All changed except the first one, since this event only has two appearances I don't think anything's lost by giving context to both of them in the Bts. Might not be necessary but it's how I've always handled it. Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 14:52, April 8, 2018 (UTC)
      • Fair enough.
  • You source info to The Essential Atlas, but it isn't under a sources heading. You should either add it or construct a ref note explaining how you got to your conclusion eg. TEA says the gungan war was in 3000 BBY. As the kidnapping of Hoxie takes place during the war, that event must take place in 3000 BBY (or something along those lines, I assume that's how you got the date). Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:07, April 8, 2018 (UTC)
  • "Shortly after the kidnapping, Boss Gallo, a Gungan who was uniting the tribes against Rogoe, arrived at Otoh Raban, and a resident of the city informed him of Hoxie's abduction, promising to join his cause if the boss was rescued." This runs on a bit, so I suggest splitting it into 2 sentences.
  • You're missing punctuation in the BTS. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 10:37, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nearly there. I think you should split up the main text into two paragraphs. Also, there shouldn't be a gap between the quote and the start of the text. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:40, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
Kidnapping of Boss Imperators
  • The intro quote seems to be missing punctuation.
    • Embarassed that I missed that
  • From the linking in the article it seems like the kidnapping was followed by the Battle of the Forest Cities, therefore it should be put in the "next" field of the infobox. Are there any other events/battles of the war that the kidnapping has a chronological relation to? Note the kidnapping should also go into {{War of the Gungan tribes}}, with the template being used on the article. Imperators II(Talk) 14:26, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added the template and "next" field, I don't think the previous battles can be linked in the infobox since the only information given as to the timeframe of the kidnapping comes from the villager saying "Very recently", so it's unclear if it occurred prior to Battle of Otoh Sancture or if it occurred after that. --Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 14:41, April 9, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • Any reason why the image isn't in the infobox? It seems relevant enough to put there. 1358 (Talk) 20:46, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
    • I was unsure if that image would have been appropriate since it portrays the aftermath of the event rather than the event itself, but I guess it still works there. Moved it. --Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 02:12, April 16, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

It just occurred to me that the character's title might not be required in the article's title, should it be removed? Commander Code-8 Felicitations malefactors! 13:14, April 8, 2018 (UTC)


Tedonia system

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 07:07, April 12, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:40, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote 1358 (Talk) 23:42, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

The Wasteland

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 00:34, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:02, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 13:41, April 21, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:07, April 22, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Solar pike

  • Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:24, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 14:17, April 21, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:03, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy

Comments

Mamkoda

  • Nominated by:--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:26, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First CA nom

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:20, April 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • What type of book is bomber command?
    • That's a good question, I always thought that they were reference books like Rebel Files, Jedi Path book, but recently the Studio fun books including this one was moved from the source to the appearances section. Its a replica journal, but I'm pretty sure its not a novel. Any suggestions to how to describe it? Maybe "in the the 2017 replica journal canon book The Last Jedi: Bomber Command"
      • Yeah that sounds good.
        • Added
  • I think you should mention the pirate's base earlier, and then go onto the weapons smuggling. Something like "In 34 ABY, a group of pirates operating in the cassander sector had a base on Mamkoda. After the first order..."
    • Mentioned earlier now
  • "After the Resistance learned that the First Order was supplying weapons to the pirates in an attempt to take control of the sector…" Who was attempting to take control of the sector, the FO or the pirates?
    • Mentioned
  • Could you say these events occur in the Cold war?
    • Mentioned
  • Battle of Mamkoda seems to have a lot of info on the resistance's forces. Could you give a bit more detail on the battle—maybe just say with a group of resistance bombers and A-wings, unless you can give a tad more detail on the battle. Nothing too much, but a bit of context. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:58, April 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • "Their first target in the sector was to destroy the pirate base in Mamkoda, which later during a battle with the pirates the Resistance forces were able to destroyed.[1]" This honestly doesn't make sense.
    • I think I've fixed it
      • Okay, I've made some small changes to improve the flow. Make sure you're happy with them. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:20, April 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • You seems to repeat "sector" at lot. Try and spice it up with some variation. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:25, April 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Congrats on your first CAN! Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:28, April 17, 2018 (UTC)
Imperators
  • Please find a way to break up the body into two paragraphs. Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • "The Battle of Mamkoda takes place shortly before the Atterra campaign" — source?
  • "which takes place during the events of Star Wars: Episode VII The Force Awakens" — source? Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • The date ref uses two consecutive clauses using "which," please reword. Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Just checking: does the source actually say "in Mamkoda"? Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • This is what the book says "Our first target was Mamkoda where the pirates seized a spaceport" --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:54, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Context for Resistance and First Order. Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • "as an answer to the threat they sent" — who's "they", the Resistance or the First Order? And in either case, both of those groups should be referred to using singular pronouns. Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • "first target in the region" — any information whatsoever on the next targets? Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • The book just mentions Mamkoda as the first target. There's two missions after it, but no mention of them being a target--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:52, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • It seems to me there's enough articles to create Category:Trans-Hydian Borderlands. Imperators II(Talk) 06:21, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • You date the establishment of the pirate base to 34 ABY, but in the date ref you talk only about the subsequent battle. Imperators II(Talk) 06:27, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • If the Battle of Mamkoda happened before an event that was concurrent to TFA, it might have happened in, say, 33 ABY. Safer to use "around 34 ABY," or, if you're talking about the establishment of the base at an unknown point prior to or during 34 ABY, then you can use "by 34 ABY." Imperators II(Talk) 06:27, April 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • The missions in the sector took place shortly before Aterra, First was Mamkoda, three days later Caraxl and immediately after Sheh Soahi. After they finished they immediately returned to D'Qar and the Aterra campaign starts per the book, but I can change the placement of the battle to around. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:52, April 23, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Suhuurmin system

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:12, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • "At some point between the Battle of Yavin and the Battle of Endor," could you just say between 0 BBY and 4 ABY? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:07, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure if that wouldn't mean losing some information along the way. I've opted to just mention both the battles and the dates instead. Imperators II(Talk) 19:04, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Tallamitta

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 16:09, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:12, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

Object

The CP
  • Hello Code-8, good to see you back. Got a couple things here:
  • Please fix the second sentence in the BTS, it's out of alignment.
  • Context on Shoran
    • I added that he was a character, let me know if that's insufficient.
  • Please add more categories (even if it is just the male 1).
  • Good job!

Comments

Majilop

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 06:41, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Yes, you read that right, it's the Porn Center of the Universe. Imperators II(Talk) 06:41, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Neat? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:47, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Lol sector? Really? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:09, April 24, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments