FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Eben Figueiredo

  • Nominated by: spookycat27talk 17:09, June 28, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: ;)

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Great work! --Jedi Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 03:20, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 17:27, July 18, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:43, July 18, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • Why have you sourced the headings in the table? I think you would just ref the end of each row, like this.
    • I altered it to resemble that, because it definitely makes more sense, but for as to why - I was originally replicating how this was ;) spookycat27talk 13:29, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
      • Ah I see. As both are FAs it shouldn't matter, but I personally think the current way is more logical and reader friendly. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 14:35, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Your mudtrooper links are for Legends. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:53, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
Real-life Imperators
  • Why do you only selectively reference some of the table rows? Imperators II(Talk) 19:19, July 5, 2018 (UTC)
    • That was per Tommy's earlier objection of comparing it to this, in which only the last listing was referenced. Different featured articles seem to have it different ways, but this was one of them spookycat27talk 19:24, July 5, 2018 (UTC)
      • Ugh, please no. If you look closer at that article's table, it also references the lines selectively, probably because the article's author wanted to do a single ref per each source. I'd like you to make it clear and easy on the readers and just ref every line. Imperators II(Talk) 19:46, July 5, 2018 (UTC)
  • Ref 1 should have some sort of indication of how the subject's birth year of 1996 was arrived at, especially given the only date visible in the accompanying screenshot is 2011. Imperators II(Talk) 16:11, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added a written note, I hope it's clearer now spookycat27talk 22:40, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
Riverdale

Comments

Parnelli Museum of Art

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:48, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 14:24, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 14:41, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 17:35, July 17, 2018 (UTC)
  4. spookycat27talk 18:29, July 19, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy

Comments

Dravin system

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:00, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:08, July 4, 2018 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:32, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Subjugator (Star Destroyer)

  • Nominated by: Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:15, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. --Ohanaka Gang Member/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 20:55, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Great work--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:11, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ECvote I honestly might have assumed this was the Star Destroyer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:47, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
  4. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 17:39, July 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Riverdale
Vitus
  • I think the intro could be slightly reworded to something similar to "The Subjugator was a starship in the Imperial Navy during the Galactic Civil War. It was in service in the aftermath of the Battle of Endor…" that way the article doesn't start off with a really short sentence.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:06, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done. Thanks for your review. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 21:10, July 9, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Caraxl

  • Nominated by: DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:53, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Here we go

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:16, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 16:03, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • "Three days after the Resistance's mission to Mamkoda, Resistance bombers tried to deliver supplies to Caraxl, but after Tallissan Lintra reported that First Order TIE fighters were on an intercept course to their position, they had to abort the mission due to an order given by General Organa of avoiding any confrontation with the First Order that could cause problems in the New Republic Senate.[1]" This runs on a bit, could you split it?
  • "Around the 34 ABY,[4]" What do you mean here? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:26, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
    • Forgot to remove "the", means around 34 ABY--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:40, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • "To stop both the pirates and First Order's plans." "Pirates" needs an apostrophe, and what were those plans? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 21:05, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please remove duplicate referencing.
  • Context on Tallie?
    • Added Resistance pilot, How is that?--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:22, July 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • "First Order TIE fighters were on an intercept course to their position they had to abort the mission" Who is they? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:47, July 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Kylo Batta

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 02:46, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This is getting out of hand. Now there are two of them!

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:47, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Clearly the inspiration for Kylo Ren. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:35, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:49, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • As the son is alive during the time of the Empire, could we establish some sort of timeframe? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:21, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
    • We can't get specific, but I've added a bit about the Imperial Period. Is that what you had in mind? - Cwedin(talk) 17:03, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
Imp
  • What fact exactly determines that the subject was alive during the Rise of the Empire era, instead of, say, the Rebellion era? Imperators II(Talk) 16:53, July 18, 2018 (UTC)
    • Kylo was of age when Kaori was born, and Kaori reached adulthood under Imperial rule, so it stands to reason that Kylo was alive before 0 BBY. - Cwedin(talk) 18:59, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
      • Well, none of this reasoning is present in the article. Note that it would have to be supported by sources providing info on Human lifespans. Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, July 20, 2018 (UTC)
        • Alright, how's it look now? - Cwedin(talk) 19:15, July 20, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Vanaria system

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Mmm…trees! Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:25, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:32, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Neoli system

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:27, July 11, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:30, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Koltine

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:38, July 16, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 15:45, July 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 17:37, July 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy

Why is the Hyperspace article the only material in the BTS to be given a full date of release? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 07:05, July 16, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Yresilini

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 12:37, July 19, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • Could we get a relevant image in there? Maybe of Tann?
    • Done.
  • "Tann received high marks from her professor and continued on a military career, her taming of the Yresilini was later recounted by soliders under her command.[1]" The latter part of the sentence seems a bit off, could you modify it please? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:27, July 18, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Eliminator

  • Nominated by: Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 14:28, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. Eliminate. Eliminate. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 00:40, July 20, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fraser Kelly

  • Nominated by: spookycat27talk 16:26, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: he was interesting to find info on

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:18, July 19, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Tommy
  • Please create the imagecat.
  • Does the actual quote say "Ron Howards"? Because his name is Ron Howard, so either you need to change it or you need to add "[sic]" after it. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:13, July 19, 2018 (UTC)
    • Altered; since he does say Ron Howards, so I added the [sic] spookycat27talk 17:29, July 19, 2018 (UTC)

Comments