FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
Premium-GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all sixteen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.
  7. Users may not vote on their own articles.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Wookiee Cookie

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 11:02, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Waag mam ga moo. Uoo waa gaa moo.

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. Good job on making me feel bad for a rathtar. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:06, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote The minute these are mentioned in a canon source you're screwed :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:54, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Yummy. 1358 (Talk) 14:59, July 10, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Grunny
  • In the opening quote "Repairs completed sir" there would normally be a comma before "sir," so is that how it's written in the subtitles?
    • Yeah, I thought the same, but I have just double-checked and that's how it is written in subtitles. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders AnilSerifoglu (talk) 18:45, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
  • The first two paragraphs of the History section are missing references.
  • In the opening sentence of the BTS, the Wookie Cookie first appearing in the video game should be referenced to LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens, as you can't source that to the starwars.com article that is currently the only reference for that sentence. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:59, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy
  • You should just have the year of release for LEGO Star Wars: The Force Awakens, so you can remove the other ref and just source it to the product itself, like you've done for the Holiday Special.
  • Context for Finn and Rey, and maybe just say that 3PO and BB-8 are droids.
  • "30" should be as "thirty". Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 09:43, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • We require that infobox images be 400px whenever possible for technical reasons. The article's other LEGO video game images are of sufficient resolution, so you should be able to get at least a 400px version of the infobox image. Might have to adjust the crop a little wider out. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:06, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
  • The Description section should detail which species were able to eat the food. Here is a recently passed GA as an example. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:05, May 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • One-sentence paragraphs are not ideal. See if you can find a way to expand the first "paragraph" of the History to be able to produce two sentences. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:18, May 7, 2018 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • The body is lacking dates and context in several places. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:44, June 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • Sorry for the delay! One more thing, could you subsection the bio? If there's another suitable quote you could add it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:14, June 27, 2018 (UTC)
    • I've divided the History section into three subsections, but unfortunately there isn't any suitable quotes for two of them. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:25, June 28, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Toy Dampner

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:13, March 25, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: It's time to start finishing up these N64 Racer pilots

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:29, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
  2. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 08:00, April 16, 2018 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:06, May 26, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 09:59, July 14, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
Toprawa
  • Question, your answer to which may result in some formatting revisions: Are you taking any of the article's quotes from on-screen game captions? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:34, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
    • Ayrehead helped address this. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:42, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
      • Okay. I wish there were more captions in the game, but it's just the translated taunts. I see I apparently mis-heard the Fode quote (Several times, in fact). I further wish it could be clarified that the pilots were all speaking Huttese or not (Or that the other lines the pilots have were translated). Alas, no. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:58, April 24, 2018 (UTC)
  • There doesn't appear to be anything critical relating to Toy Dampner on that old Japanese Episode I racer site, as fascinating as it is to time travel back into the web like that. But I see there are multiple pages relating to specific characters and whatnot, so if there's a specific page that has Dampner info on it, that's what you should be linking to. Otherwise, it can just be removed. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:34, April 26, 2018 (UTC)
    • He's listed on the character page on the third page. There's a blurb that roughly translates too "*"Toy" to participate in the pod race is never a toy. His pod racer is very well-balanced. This pod racer demonstrates its capabilities quickly in any race, and it has excellent performance without upgrading.*". Largely sounds out of universe as player tips. I figured it might be a somewhat relevant link as it's the official site (I can link to that page of the site), but if the site in general doesn't seem relevant I can remove it. Your call, I think. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:13, May 3, 2018 (UTC)
      • No, the site and that information are perfectly relevant. I just want you to link to the actual page that has this information. Please replace the link with the URL to that third page with the character information. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:43, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
        • Ah, okay then. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:00, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
          • Is there any way for you to translate what this web page calls itself in the browser tab? Ideally, we would present that name, and I'm assuming it's not "Official Nintendo Japan Star Wars Episode I: Racer site." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:25, May 19, 2018 (UTC)
            • The text in the browser tab appears on the page itself, underneath the words "The Pilots." With Google translate, a more literal translation is "Introduction to pilots." The browser tab for the main page of the site is just "Star Wars Episode I Racer" (No colon after Star Wars). So, I suppose it the link could be written as "Star Wars Episode I Racer - The Pilots/Introduction to pilots (Page 3)." Maybe it's relation to Nintendo Power could be mentioned in parenthesis, if only for reader clarification. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:33, May 19, 2018 (UTC)
QGJ
  • {{Cite_web}} should be implemented for the first link in the External links section. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 16:17, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
    • Forgive me for interjecting, but actually it shouldn't. Citeweb is only meant to be used for actual citations in the course of an article's Notes and references. It's been a common misconception among newer editors over the past year or so to start using the template anywhere there's an external link, but that's not proper usage of the template. For items in the External links section like this one, just add a backup link next to the URL using {{C}}. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:25, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
Grunny
  • In the intro: "Dampner became a favorite on the moon Oovo IV, where the race courses sped through the prison Desolation Alley. Dampner was considered to be the crowd favorite for the deadly Executioner course," This reads as if the Executioner course could be a different course on which he is the favorite, rather than the course in Desolation Alley. I think this could be written more clearly.
  • In the intro, you refer to him as the "crowd favorite," but in the body you only refer to him as the "race favorite" and "track favorite." A "race favorite" or "track favorite" could just mean that they were considered the most likely person to win (such as when gambling on a race), but a "crowd favorite" is about their popularity with spectators. If they were the "crowd favorite," that should also be used in the body, rather than just in the intro. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:25, April 26, 2018 (UTC)
    • I'll double check when I get back to my guides, but I believe they use the terms "crowd" and "track" favorite interchangeably. "Race" favorite is interjected by myself as a way to vary wording.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:13, May 3, 2018 (UTC)
      • If "crowd" favorite is used in the source, I would make sure that is used in the body where appropriate, since it has a clearer meaning and more context than "race" or "track" favorite, so it shouldn't be only in the intro. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 07:02, May 11, 2018 (UTC)
        • 'Track favorite' I noticed seems to be used more in the game itself, so I just switched to that. Also added that he was the favorite in the bio now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:20, May 14, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

With the GoG version out I've been looking at the audio files now and collecting new screenshots. The scripts for the pilots seem largely the same with some exceptions. All of it seems to be Huttese, which means most can probably be translated. I added a new quote to the P&T, which translates to "Careful punk." Do I need to translate that for the article? Or, just leave it as it is? Or does the spelling or meaning need sources?

I was thinking about adding new quotes to the other articles, and was wondering about trying to spell out some of the phrases, translating if possible (Slide's "Chuba pitdroid" is literally just "Hey you pitdroid"), or maybe being more vague like ""[Taunt]" - Pilot taunts a Pilot"--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:20, May 14, 2018 (UTC)


Mass Shadow Generator

  • Nominated by: Vitus InfinitusTalk 16:41, April 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A CA that is now a bit too big

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Good work! Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:56, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Keep in mind the "See also" sections are only for topics not linked elsewhere in the article. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 06:49, June 1, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • You should split the first sentence of the history section. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • I think you might have forgotten to actually do this :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
        • Oops. Might have gotten ahead of myself. Now it's done--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:25, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Anywhere that you use the AFE dating system you should clarify that they're years you are talking about since most people aren't use to that format. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Done--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • I'd change it to "the years 14 and 19 AFE" as the current wording requires the reader to know what AFE stands for in order for it to make sense. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think you can date the discovery of the Rebel Files to 34 ABY since they are said to have been buried simultaneously with the Battle of Endor (4 ABY) and a comment says that "no-one has seen them for 30 years". Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added. Should I also add a note or just reference it to Rebel Files?--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • You should definitely add a reference note. If ever in doubt when it comes to referencing a date the safest bet is to write a separate ref, especially with canon. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
        • Added--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:25, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
          • Now I think about it, since you now have an ABY date in the article you should probably change the AFE dates to be BBY as well for consistency. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:20, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Context for Korr Sella. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
  • I think you need to add something to the description section about the image it's based on being from a report that claims the thing might not have ever even existed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:33, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
    • Added--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:26, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
      • I'd reword this to something more like: in a rebel report that acknowledged that the generator might be nothing more than a tall tale, it was depicted as... etc." Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
Imperators Shadow Generator
  • Formatting and linking in ref 3. Imperators II(Talk) 18:36, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • "Since The Rebel Files were buried on the same day as the Battle of Endor" — source? Imperators II(Talk) 18:36, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
  • The formatting of the in-universe Rebel Files' title is inconsistent in the article. Imperators II(Talk) 06:56, May 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • I've removed the fate of the Rebel Files from the article, as it was extraneous and not relevant to the article's subject. Imperators II(Talk) 06:56, May 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • The part about the generator supposedly being able to exist in realspace and hyperspace should be moved to Characteristics. Imperators II(Talk) 11:18, May 27, 2018 (UTC)
  • Also, when you first refer to the generator in that section, you should use its full name. Imperators II(Talk) 11:18, May 27, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • "The generator was part of a report by Haxen Delto in Imperial weapons projects" Not 100% sure what you intend to say here. Do you happen to mean "part of a report by Haxen Delto on Imperial weapons projects"? As in the report was about Imperial weapons projects.
  • The two "would" clauses in the second paragraph of History make for a rather long run-on sentence. Can we please split it up? Also, in general, avoid (over)using "would" as you're just going to run into tense issues. 1358 (Talk) 20:26, June 27, 2018 (UTC)
  • One more: I have some issues with the description. May I recommend something like this: "...it was depicted within the same report as being axially symmetrical in design. In the center, a pair of square pyramids—with truncated tops—was joined by their bases, with a trench running along the connecting line. A smaller pyramid was mounted on top of each of the central pyramids, with two dishes in turn being located atop the smaller pyramids." I feel like it's important to convey that the pyramids were truncated at the top and I also think there's no need to say there's four of them before you describe them—that's obvious from the description itself. Just a suggestion. 1358 (Talk) 10:16, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • As we discussed, the mass-market version of The Rebel Files is now available. Therefore, please upload a high-quality scan from the book for this article's image. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 11:28, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
    • Will be getting this done soon. Images are much smaller than I imagined.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 14:12, July 9, 2018 (UTC)
      • After personally obtaining the book and getting HD scans of the images, the images on this article, along with Senatorial arrests and Torpedo Sphere, are of the highest possible quality. If the book were available digitally it might be a different story, but the way these were printed, these are of the best quality.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 02:52, July 14, 2018 (UTC)
        • I'm calling shenanigans on this. You didn't upload anything. All of the images on these articles are the same ones uploaded months ago by you and Tommy that you obtained from the bootleg pdf you found on Kaskus or wherever. I guarantee higher-quality versions can be uploaded using a high-quality scanner. If you got HD scans of these images, upload them and show us. Otherwise, I see no choice here but to consider this objection unaddressed. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:22, July 21, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • I will be on vacation and thus unavailable between May 31st to June 18th. I will not be able to address objections during that time as I will have no effective means of doing so. I will be taking care of all raised objections between now to the 31st, thank you for understanding.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:47, May 19, 2018 (UTC)


Ambush of Attichitcuk

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 13:32, July 9, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Fred strikes back
  • There's an unreferenced item in the infobox.
    • How careless of me.
  • Be careful of linking. See the article's history for my changes in the infobox and intro. Remember that you need to link the first mention of a topic and that it should only be linked once in the intro, once in the infobox, once in the body, and then in reference notes.
    • Thanks for doing that, I've adjusted some other linking issues too
  • More to come once I have some more time. Glad to have you back! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:47, May 4, 2018 (UTC)
  • As there is more than one image related to the topic, {{Imagecat}} should be used. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 22:58, May 13, 2018 (UTC)
    • Since the second image is portraying the rescue, a separate event with its own article I don't think categorizing it as an image of the ambush would be accurate. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:01, May 14, 2018 (UTC)
      • I suppose that's fair. This all gets very confusing and convoluted because time is treated very weirdly in GB and it makes separating events iffy. I'll let this slide as {{Imagecat}} would be best used in Alaris Prime colonial war. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:16, May 14, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

2BB-2

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:03, April 28, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Since everyone is such a huge fan of Canto Bight, maybe I'll break up my TLJ nominations with some other stuff

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:30, June 1, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:36, July 20, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Harro Kelpura

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:02, June 26, 2018 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:47, June 30, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
Grunny
  • From reading the intro quote, I believe the first speaker is Kungurama, not Kelpura, is that right? If so, the order they are listed in the attribution should match the order in which they speak in the quote for clarity, so Kungurama should be mentioned first in the attribution for the quote. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:08, June 11, 2018 (UTC)
  • In the opening sentence, the "and investigated an alien escape pod" feels like a bit of an awkward addition, and I think it would be better split into its own sentence, maybe with the time period, i.e. finish the first sentence after "Coruscant" and follow it with something like "During the Clone Wars, he was tasked with investigating an alien escaped pod." What do you think? grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:58, June 22, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • This sentence is in need of additional context. Like...he investigated an alien escape pod that crashed-landed on Coruscant, for example? Where is this escape pod/what is it doing that he's investigating it? "In the midst of the war, he investigated an alien escape pod..." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 10:37, July 2, 2018 (UTC)
  • In reference 2, this statement is not self-sourcing: "The battle takes place just prior to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Secret Missions series, including Secret Missions 4: Guardians of the Chiss Key." That needs to be attributed to something. It should say something like "According to [source], the battle takes place just prior..."
  • You really don't need reference 3. If the book says he was discovered eleven years prior to its events, then that doesn't need a special reference. You only need a special reference if you're explicitly mentioning the 33 BBY date, but since it's being pipelinked, it doesn't need one. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 13:15, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
  • Why is the fact that Kungurama leading the clone unit Breakout Squad relevant to Kelpura's role in the story? This seems like extraneous detail. "Kungurama, now leading the clone trooper unit Breakout Squad..."
  • Why is Palpatine here, and why is Kit Fisto suggesting they go to the Senate Building? None of these details are provided any relevance or significance to the story and Kelpura's role in it. We're left wondering what was the point of their involvement, since they're never mentioned again. "...met Kelpura at the Senate Building with Supreme Chancellor Palpatine and departed for the Jedi Temple on Master Kit Fisto's suggestion."
  • Kelpura was traveling with the group by freighter? It would have been nice to know this upfront rather than dropping this detail in as an afterthought at the end of the paragraph. "Kungurama's freighter crashed after the dropship belonging to a bounty hunter assisting Ambase impacted it." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:20, July 3, 2018 (UTC)

Comments


Unidentified dreadnought

  • Nominated by: Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 13:04, June 15, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I'm back! (*background groans*)

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:32, July 7, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • Isn't there anything that the transmitter could be linked to? Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:17, July 7, 2018 (UTC)
    • To be honest, I'm struggling to think of something that wouldn't be assumption. The transmitter is described vaguely and for all we know, it could be a tracker, some kind of droid or just a guy sending the occasional email back to Coruscant. Life Debt says "The ships dumped data across the stars, transmitting pulses of information to this location. That provides a black-box recording so one could discern what exactly happened before a ship was destroyed, captured or surrendered." Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 10:49, July 7, 2018 (UTC)
      • Fair enough, in that case maybe it should be removed from the infobox or atleast re-worded there since it currently sounds like a specific piece of technology. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, July 7, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Y-85 Titan dropship

  • Nominated by: Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 12:04, June 17, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I have a soft spot for these things, but I suspect we'll never see them in action.

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:19, June 30, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Toh My!
Ayrehead
  • You'll need to add a reference for 3 ABY since Complete Locations doesn't use the ABY dating system anywhere. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:45, June 30, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Anna Francolini

  • Nominated by: spookycat27talk
  • Nomination comments: Wanted to try this out, wookieepedia isn't my home wiki, but I do like writing random biographies sometimes

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Tommy
  • Article currently violates GAN rule 7. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:10, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • Sorry it's fixed now, I'd forgotten to remove it.spookycat27talk 20:21, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
Imp
  • Hi, welcome to the GAN. Please see this. Imperators II(Talk) 20:26, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • Fixed (hopefully) and thank you^^ spookycat27talk 20:42, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please eliminate any use of double referencing, i.e., two references one after another, like [3][10]. Either attribute each sentence/part of sentence/word(s) to the precise, specific references that support each bit of info, or write out a manual reference note that explains where the information is derived from. Imperators II(Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please fill out as much parameters as possible and appropriate in each usage of {{Cite_web}}. Imperators II(Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
    • I added all that were available, but a few didn't have authors listed, so I'm hoping that will be okay spookycat27talk 22:05, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please change all usages of to '. Imperators II(Talk) 20:57, June 23, 2018 (UTC)
  • Also, I'd sure like to see the other works in the infobox organized like here. Imperators II(Talk) 20:58, June 23, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Nossor Ri/Legends

  • Nominated by: --Boot Lover (Wanna Discuss Something?) 03:52, June 30, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I have been working on the article, and feel it is now ready for nomination. I will try my best to correct any mistakes found.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Lewis

I've added it back. --Nikto Enforcer/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 19:02, July 8, 2018 (UTC)

Tommy
Spooky

Comments


Quarren Warrior

  • Nominated by: --Boot Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 18:41, July 1, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I recently added numerous paragraphs focusing on characteristics, history, and more, however, I would not be able to have a strong reason to nominate if it wasn't for some very helpful users.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Lewsir

You're definitely going to need to expand upon their role in the occupation of Mon Cala. --Lewisr (talk) 14:11, July 3, 2018 (UTC)

Vitus

Comments

Elis Helrot

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:06, July 7, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let me appease those unenthused by my TLJ nominations with some OT goodness.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Tommy
  • In ref 2, could you say GA also dates the Battle of Yavin to 0 BBY? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 10:28, July 7, 2018 (UTC)
Code-8
  • Is there a reason the Legends-canon split isn't acknowledged in the BTS? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 15:25, July 22, 2018 (UTC)
    • Oops, forgot to mention the decipher set was Legends. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:29, July 22, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Sweitt Concorkill

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:50, July 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I always wondered why this guy was in Palpatine's box given that he was in the Delegation of 2000.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. --Jedi Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 21:29, July 10, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Riverdale

Comments

Death Star's shield generator

  • Nominated by: Shayn Mikel (talk) 18:28, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. --Jedi Lover/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 19:06, July 12, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Riverdale
Tommy
  • What card in Star Wars: Force Collection? Please use Template:ForceCollection.
    • I never had the game and the sourcing at Dyer's article is also incomplete. Since the game is down, I don't know of a way to access this information. Should I remove it for being unsourced, or is there a way to look up the relevant card? Shayn Mikel (talk) 18:55, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
      • Try this. This is what the template automatically links to. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:57, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
  • Please establish a timeline.
  • Please watch your image caption punctuation per Wookieepedia:Layout_Guide#Images. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 18:49, July 12, 2018 (UTC)
Clone
  • Similar to the Legends page for this and other pages dealing with structures, there should be a "Description" section before the "History" section that describes the structure physical and aesthetic attributes, and its purpose and role.
  • I would also recommend that you check out some of the behind the scene sourcebooks and materials for Return of the Jedi and see if the "Behind the Scenes" section couldn't be fleshed out more in some manner.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:42, July 17, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Purpruff

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:29, July 22, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Gigorans are damn cool

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Looks good to me, great work--Vitus InfinitusTalk 18:11, July 22, 2018 (UTC)
  2. --White-Helmeted Mandalorian/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 18:28, July 22, 2018 (UTC)

Object

Riverdale
  • Under the "Amongst the Fallen" header, there's this: The Alliance ultimately choose to follow...

I believe you mean "chose," instead of "choose." --White-Helmeted Mandalorian/Riverdale Chauffeur (Wanna Discuss Something?) 17:38, July 22, 2018 (UTC)

Comments